Legacy middleware costs compound
BizTalk and SAP PI carry rising licence, infrastructure, and specialist labour costs. The longer the platform stays, the smaller the talent pool that can keep it running safely.
Used by Nurminen Logistics, Fazer, and Prima Pet Premium. A practical framework for moving off legacy middleware without disrupting the business that depends on it.
The cost of standing still
The trigger is rarely a single failure. It's the slow accumulation of cost, fragility, and risk that makes the current platform a tax on every other strategic project.
BizTalk and SAP PI carry rising licence, infrastructure, and specialist labour costs. The longer the platform stays, the smaller the talent pool that can keep it running safely.
Years of point-to-point connections, undocumented orchestrations, and one-off fixes turn the platform into a fragile core that blocks every new business initiative.
SAP PI/PO mainstream support ends in 2027. BizTalk 2020 is the last release. Waiting moves the migration from a planned programme to an emergency one.
Interactive tool
Five questions. A personalised recommendation based on your portfolio size, team experience, and risk appetite — with a matching case study.
Single cutover event. Best for smaller portfolios with strong testing capability. Fast, but all-or-nothing.
Move by business domain — CRM first, then ERP, then Finance. Cleaner risk control when domains have clear boundaries.
Start simple, build confidence. Low-risk integrations first — the team learns the platform before tackling mission-critical systems.
Interactive tool
Plot your integrations by business impact and technical complexity. The quadrant they land in determines their migration priority and wave sequence.
Start with your 2 quick wins in Wave 1 — these deliver immediate value and build team confidence. Then plan extended parallel running for your 2 critical path integrations in Waves 2–3 with detailed rollback procedures. Evaluate the 1 lower-impact item for retirement before committing migration effort.
The four quadrants
The quadrant an integration lands in answers two questions for you: when to migrate it, and how much rigour the migration needs.
High business impact, low complexity. Migrate first to prove value and build team momentum on the platform.
High impact, high complexity. The integrations that run the business. Plan parallel running, detailed rollback, and dedicated cutover windows.
Low impact, low complexity. Bundle into batches once the team is fluent. Useful for newer engineers to learn on real work.
Low impact, high complexity. Strong candidates for retirement, consolidation, or replacement with a SaaS equivalent before any migration effort.
Interactive tool
Work through the five readiness dimensions before kick-off. Your score updates as you check items off, and the share link lets your team complete it together.
Real migrations
Three organisations. Three different strategies. All moved off legacy platforms with no disruption to their operations.
A 140-year-old Finnish freight forwarder running three integration platforms in parallel. No in-house integration resources and rising maintenance costs. They committed to a full migration to Frends and consolidated everything into one platform with no operational disruption.
A €1.1B Nordic food company with eight countries and diverse business units, each with their own integration needs. SAP announcing PI/PO end-of-life forced their hand, and Fazer used it to modernise rather than just migrate.
A Finnish premium pet food manufacturer. Small IT team, no prior iPaaS experience, ERP operations that could not afford disruption. They started with a non-critical pilot to learn the platform before touching anything business-critical.
After migration
Organisations that treat migration as the finish line watch their new platform drift into the same chaos they just escaped. Here's what the best ones do next.
Standards that enable speed. A living integration handbook — naming conventions, approved patterns, security requirements — that developers actually use because it makes their work easier.
One central team doing all the work creates backlogs. A Center for Enablement publishes reusable templates and trains business units to build independently, scaling capacity without scaling headcount.
Start with high-volume, low-risk use cases — invoice exception handling, ticket routing. Keep transparency and auditability. Pilot, learn, refine, then scale. Not everything needs AI, and not all at once.
Define normal baselines. Configure alerts that distinguish signal from noise. Build dashboards that show integration health in business terms, not just uptime percentages.
Schedule regular refactoring sprints before debt accumulates. Update deprecated connectors, consolidate redundant integrations, forecast capacity before it becomes an incident.
Quarterly roadmap reviews, beta program access, active feedback to shape platform direction. The organisations that get the most value treat their iPaaS vendor as a strategic relationship, not a software purchase.
Short conversations with the engineers and CIOs from Nurminen and other migrations on what they would do differently and what they got right.
Talk to a Frends migration specialist. We'll review your integration landscape, recommend a strategy, and scope what a migration to Frends actually looks like for your organisation.